Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2025

Publication Title

The Georgetown Law Journal

Abstract

As part of the legal profession’s tradition of self-regulation, attorneys have an ethical obligation to ensure that those within it are fit to practice. Given the gravity associated with accusing another lawyer of misconduct, it is not surprising that many are reticent to speak up. But what would happen if attorneys were pressured to vigorously pursue sanctions against their opponents, even if those sanctions may be unwarranted? President Trump’s recently-issued memorandum arguably does just that, mandating the Attorney General to seek court and disciplinary sanctions for lawyers and law firms that appear to violate ethics rules. This Essay explains how this directive may put some federal government attorneys in a conundrum where they will have to choose between placating the Administration or standing firm, and it explores the ethical and other professional consequences that may follow from their choice.

Volume

114

First Page

47

Last Page

66

Download

Share

COinS