Neuroimaging Research into Disorders of Consciousness: Moral Imperative or Ethical and Legal Failure
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2008
Publication Title
Virginia Journal of Law & Technology
Abstract
In this article I explore the ethical and legal implications of enrolling individuals with disorders of consciousness (DOC) in neuroimaging research studies. Many scientists have strongly emphasized the need for additional neuroimaging research into DOC, characterizing the conduct of such studies as morally imperative. On the other hand, institutional review boards (IRBs) charged with approving research protocols, scientific journals deciding whether to publish study results, and federal agencies that disburse grant money have limited the conduct, publication, and funding of consciousness investigations based on ethical and legal concerns. Following a detailed examination of the risks and benefits of neuroimaging research involving individuals with DOC, I urge IRBs, scientific journals, and funding agencies to no longer stall the conduct, publication, and funding of neuroimaging research into DOC if certain criteria designed to protect the health and safety of individuals with DOC are satisfied.
Volume
13
First Page
1
Recommended Citation
Stacey A. Tovino, Neuroimaging Research into Disorders of Consciousness: Moral Imperative or Ethical and Legal Failure, 13 Va. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2008).
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons, Privacy Law Commons